Approved by AICTE, New Delhi | Affiliated to Anna University, Chennai

TNEA Code

1405

SSR

Criterion 2 - Teaching - Learning and Evaluation

Criterion 3 - Research, Innovative and Extension

Key Indicator 3.1 – Resource Mobilization for Research
3.1.1 (QnM)
The institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous Internal Assessment
Key Indicator 3.2 – Innovation Ecosystem
3.2.1 (QlM)
Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge (patents filed, published, incubation center facilities in the HEI to be considered)
3.2.2 (QnM)
Number of workshops /seminars / conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years
Key Indicator 3.3 – Research Publication and Awards
3.3.1 (QnM)
Number of research published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years
3.3.2 (QnM)
Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books published and papers in national / international conference proceedings year wise during last five years
Key Indicator 3.4 – Extension Activities
3.4.1 (QlM)
Extension activities are carried out in the neighbourhood community, sensitizing students to social issues for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years
3.4.2 (QlM)
Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government bodies
3.4.3(QnM)
Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC etc., (including the programmes such as Swachh Bharath, AIDS awareness, Gender issues, etc. and / or those organized in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs) during the last five years.
Key Indicator 3.5 – Collaboration
3.5.1 (QnM)
The number of MoUs, Collaboration / linkages for Faculty exchange, Student exchange, Internship, Field project, On-the-job training, research and other academic activities during the last five years

Criterion 5 - Student Support and Progressions

Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support
5.1.1 (QnM)
Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government and non-government agencies and philanthropists during last five years
5.1.2 (QnM)
Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution include the following Soft skills Language and communication skills Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) ICT/Computing skills
5.1.3 (QnM)
Percentage of students benefited by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years.
5.1.4 (QnM)
The institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression
5.2.1 (QnM)
Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years
5.2.2 (QnM)
Percentage of students qualifying in state / national /international level examination during the last five years (e.g. JAM/CLAT/GATE/GMAT/CAT/GRE/TOEFL/ Civil services / State Government examinations)
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
5.3.1(QnM)
Number of awards / medals for outstanding performance in sports / cultural activities at University / state / national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.2 (QnM)
Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the institution participated during last five years (organized by the institution / other institutions)
Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement
5.4.1 (QlM)
There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services

Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1 (QlM)
The governance and leadership is in accordance with vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participation in the institutional governance
Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1 (QlM)
The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, deployment of institutional Strategic / perspective / development plan etc.
6.2.2 (QnM)
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
1. Administration
2. Finance and accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination
Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1(QlM)
The institution has effective welfare measures and Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff
6.3.2(QnM)
Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fees of professional bodies during the last five years.
6.3.3 (QnM)
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty Development Programmes (FDP), professional development / administrative training programs during the last five years.
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.4.1 (QlM)
Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government / non-government organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)
Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 (QlM)
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for the institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities.
6.5.2 (QnM)
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented
2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken
3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings
5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc

Criterion 7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices

Key Indicator – 7.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation
7.1.1 (QlM)
Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity and Institutional initiatives to celebrate / organize national and international commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five years
7.1.2 (QnM)
The institution has facilities and initiatives for
1. Alternative sources of energy and energy conservation measures
2. Management of various types of degradable and non-degradable waste
3. Water conservation
4. Green campus initiatives
5. Disabled friendly barrier free environment
7.1.3 (QnM)
Quality audit on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following.
1. Green audit /Environmental audit
2. Energy audit
3. Clean and green campus initiatives
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion and sustainability activities
7.1.4 (QlM)
Describe the Institutional efforts / initiatives in providing an inclusive environment. I.e. tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations; values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens.
Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices
7.2.1 (QlM)
Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual
Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
7.3.1 (QlM)
Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust